Full Flush Poker scam information and Game Protect statement

full flush poker scamFull Flush Poker scam further info:

Full Flush Poker Litigation 70:30 in process, join + claim your money!

Equity Poker Network, Full Flush
_______________________________________________

A) Pedro Caules Coll purchased the Full Flush Poker scam

I have a document and statement that Calexico de Capitales INT SL, street Cautivos De Constantinopla 42 2, 07760 (Ciutadella de Menorca) Menorca, Balearic islands, Spain purchased the Full Flush poker scam February 2016:

  • Sole director is Finances y Transactions Menorca SL, Calle Cautivos De Constantinopla 42 2, 07760 (Ciutadella De Menorca), Menorca, Balearic islands, Spain.
  • Sole partner is Pedro Caules Coll. He is fully liable for the money owed and criminal offenses committed. Pedro Caules Coll probably also committed the criminal offense of tax evasion for the salary he took out of the Full Flush Poker scam.
  • Numero (number) D-U-N-S: 466329010
  • CIF/NIF (tax number): B57910705

B) Playsafe Holding AS was Full Flush Poker scam software provider

They are at least liable based on negligence or even participated actively. Clive Archer (ex CEO) stated that Full Flush Poker did not pay the gaming software fees to Playsafe. As everyone can surely imagine, the software provider fees are the last thing a gaming company will not pay, because without the gaming software = no offer/business.

Hence, not paying the software provider fees, at least strongly indicate that Full Flush Poker did not honour player balances as well! When Playsafe Holding AS do not receive their software license fee, then they are obliged by law to check the status of the operator. 15 minutes google would have revealed that their licensee do not honour player funds = criminal offense of embezzlement!

Without Playsafe’s gaming software delivery, the Full Flush Poker scam would have been not able to continue! And this makes Playsafe Holding AS liable, obviously.

File complaint against Full Flush Poker scam + Playsafe Holding AS

Game Protect offer to file a criminal complaint at the cyber crime police in Madrid, Spain against the following participants of the Full Flush Poker scam scheme. The estimated costs to file a criminal complaint in Madrid are approximately $2,000 and include:

  • Travel expenses to Madrid
  • Stay at least 14 days in a cheap hotel
  • Pay lawyer to prepare the criminal complaint in Spanish language and lodge it at the police

Bitcoin deposit address: 14EXS6DguUakKYxNo2XfHBg3fikz8Cwk3u

Amount required: $2,000

Collected to date: …

Please add “Criminal complaint” and your Game Protect username or email address to the reference field. If we will not reach the required amount, I will send the collected BTC back to the sender. Everyone can check the collected amount on blockchain.info

1 Comment

Add a Comment
  1. Quote NOEL: “Hi, recently law firm start asking for 1500$ to be paid upfront which is a contradictory to “cost free”.”

    No, law firm ask for court fees is not contradictory to our offer:

    Quote Game Protect: “The litigation proceeding is cost free for you and if we are not able to collect your account balance, your claim is still valid.”

    A litigation proceeding has several levels and you received a cost free investigation, legal evaluation and demand letter. Game Protect nowhere state which levels will be included and I also do not know in advance which levels will be required. The action we provided could have lead to payment. Your claim is still valid and you can do whatever you like with it!

    Quote NOEL: “Total amount requested is more than 50k, so I guess if they can take money from fullflush – they would happily work for 30%.”

    How do you know that the proven amount is more than 50k? Did players send you a copy of their claim?

    They would not claim money from Full Flush Poker, but from other liable and solvent parties.

    Quote NOEL: “Asking for money means they view chances extremely close to zero.”

    No, to take the case on a contingency basis means that there is a realistic chance to win the case. They would never spend all the time and effort for free, if the chance is close to zero. Based on my knowledge and experience, if a law firm take a case on a contingency fee basis, the expected chance to win the case and receive money is at least around 25%.

    The law firm ask only for the court fee of the participants. Why should they spend all the time and money and participants get a free ride?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *